Rating

    No results.
12

Keeping “Free Law” Free

Who should pay to store and distribute the litigation records in US federal courts? The answer is surprisingly contentious – and, by all indications, getting more so. When the general public wants to read documents in US federal litigation, the standard method is PACER – the federal courts’ electronic record system. One might think this …

Continue reading “Keeping “Free Law” Free”

→ Read More: Keeping “Free Law” Free

Keeping “Free Law” Free

Who should pay to store and distribute the litigation records in US federal courts? The answer is surprisingly contentious – and, by all indications, getting more so. When the general public wants to read documents in US federal litigation, the standard method is PACER – the federal courts’ electronic record system. One might think this …

Continue reading “Keeping “Free Law” Free”

→ Read More: Keeping “Free Law” Free

Keeping “Free Law” Free

Who should pay to store and distribute the litigation records in US federal courts? The answer is surprisingly contentious – and, by all indications, getting more so. When the general public wants to read documents in US federal litigation, the standard method is PACER – the federal courts’ electronic record system. One might think this …

Continue reading “Keeping “Free Law” Free”

→ Read More: Keeping “Free Law” Free

Keeping “Free Law” Free

Who should pay to store and distribute the litigation records in US federal courts? The answer is surprisingly contentious – and, by all indications, getting more so. When the general public wants to read documents in US federal litigation, the standard method is PACER – the federal courts’ electronic record system. One might think this …

Continue reading “Keeping “Free Law” Free”

→ Read More: Keeping “Free Law” Free

Keeping “Free Law” Free

Who should pay to store and distribute the litigation records in US federal courts? The answer is surprisingly contentious – and, by all indications, getting more so. When the general public wants to read documents in US federal litigation, the standard method is PACER – the federal courts’ electronic record system. One might think this …

Continue reading “Keeping “Free Law” Free”

→ Read More: Keeping “Free Law” Free

Keeping “Free Law” Free

Who should pay to store and distribute the litigation records in US federal courts? The answer is surprisingly contentious – and, by all indications, getting more so. When the general public wants to read documents in US federal litigation, the standard method is PACER – the federal courts’ electronic record system. One might think this …

Continue reading “Keeping “Free Law” Free”

→ Read More: Keeping “Free Law” Free

Keeping “Free Law” Free

Who should pay to store and distribute the litigation records in US federal courts? The answer is surprisingly contentious – and, by all indications, getting more so. When the general public wants to read documents in US federal litigation, the standard method is PACER – the federal courts’ electronic record system. One might think this …

Continue reading “Keeping “Free Law” Free”

→ Read More: Keeping “Free Law” Free

News update, copyright guidance

Now that we are past the SIGIR camera-ready deadline, I posted a call for submissions to IRlist.  We now have two submissions, and I hope we can post them next week. I was asked by a potential author about copyright conflicts.  I corresponded with ACM and received the following guidance.  When you have a paper […] → Read More: News update, copyright guidance

News update, copyright guidance

Now that we are past the SIGIR camera-ready deadline, I posted a call for submissions to IRlist.  We now have two submissions, and I hope we can post them next week. I was asked by a potential author about copyright conflicts.  I corresponded with ACM and received the following guidance.  When you have a paper […] → Read More: News update, copyright guidance

News update, copyright guidance

Now that we are past the SIGIR camera-ready deadline, I posted a call for submissions to IRlist.  We now have two submissions, and I hope we can post them next week. I was asked by a potential author about copyright conflicts.  I corresponded with ACM and received the following guidance.  When you have a paper […] → Read More: News update, copyright guidance

12